Skip Navigation

Overview and Guidelines

Overview & Guidelines

The University of Oklahoma is at the forefront of addressing global challenges and is launching the 2nd OU Big Idea Challenge. BIC 2.0 is intended to incentivize the formation of transdisciplinary, convergent research teams focused on global grand challenges and will provide seed funding to incubate ideas with the potential for future extramural support and significant societal impact. 

Background

As a flagship public institution keenly focused on societal impact through research and creative activity, the University of Oklahoma is uniquely positioned to bring a diverse set of academic disciplines together to foster innovative, comprehensive solutions to global challenges. Pillar 5 of the Lead On, University Strategic Plan defines four strategic verticals that focus on grand challenges in:

  • Aerospace, defense, and global security
  • Energy and environmental sustainability
  • The future of health
  • Society and community transformation

In addition, OU’s research framework recognizes the importance of various academic areas of research and creative activity that serve as foundational elements of our research strategy. In our vision for research and creative activity, researchers move beyond and across traditional academic boundaries, collaborating across disciplines and globally with other universities, policymakers, economists, humanists, artists and designers, and business leaders to create solutions for a better world. Our goal is to transcend academic disciplines and bring all of OU’s institutional strengths together to tackle global challenges and accelerate the delivery of practical solutions that impact society in direct and tangible ways.

To address global grand challenges and positively impact society at the global, national, and regional scales, innovative approaches and new methodologies that converge the perspectives from science, engineering, business, social sciences, arts, design, and the humanities are needed. Transdisciplinarity occurs when two or more discipline perspectives combine to transcend traditional boundaries and form a new holistic approach. The outcome will be completely different from what one would expect from the addition of the parts. Transdisciplinary research is defined as research efforts conducted by investigators from different disciplines working jointly to create new conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and translational innovations that integrate and move beyond discipline-specific approaches to address a common problem.

The BIC 2.0 program builds on the tremendous success of our recently concluded first Big Idea Challenge initiative[JCE1] , launched in 2021 and provided resources to transdisciplinary teams of OU faculty, students, postdocs and research staff pursuing bold projects that go well beyond traditional inter- and multidisciplinary efforts. BIC 2.0 is intended to disrupt our current research frameworks and approaches, which are often siloed and too dependent upon department- and college-centric thinking. These projects will position OU as a leader in generating new insights and game-changing contributions to solving regional, national and global challenges in security, sustainability, health and communities.

The transdisciplinary teams supported by BIC 2.0 will pursue system-level projects that integrate social, political, ethical, legal, humanistic, design and creative arts considerations with advanced science and engineering ideas to generate new holistic impacts and outcomes. Integrating science, engineering and design and creative arts thinking with the deepest analysis of societal impacts and risks while keeping the "big picture" in mind will ensure that the great idea your team will bring to life will be truly transformative. We welcome proposals for projects that advance social justice goals in research and public impact.

Scope and Themes

The BIC 2.0 program will fund three to four teams. Project periods will last up to two years (depending on the scope of the proposal). BIC 2.0 is not intended to provide all the resources required to create the ultimate solution to a global challenge, nor to fund a center or an institute. Rather, the purpose of the program is to help nucleate teams and ideas that will create opportunities for new and significant external funding—both public and private. The creation of these opportunities will position OU as a national and global leader in the selected areas and thus grow the scope, scale and impact on society of OU’s research and creative activity. At the same time, it will chart new pathways to discoveries, innovations, and social and policy solutions, while training the next generation of future transdisciplinary talent.

The themes for the BIC 2.0 program align with OU’s Lead On, University Strategic Plan, and with the OU research strategic framework[JCE1] . In addressing these themes, successful proposals will be cross-cutting and multi-faceted, involving integrated equal contributions to the overall project from faculty in the arts, humanities, professional programs, and STEM disciplines, as appropriate.

Listed below are five BIC 2.0 thematic focus areas where teams of OU researchers could address global grand challenges. Proposals that cut across these topics (within or even preferably across themes) and bring multiple areas together to pursue a big idea are highly encouraged and will be given priority.

Theme 1: Strategies for adaptation to climate change, extreme and severe weather, and global impacts on human health and security

Climate Change is accelerating, and its impacts are being felt increasingly around the world. The scientific consensus expressed via the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2023 6th assessment [JCE1] report states with “High Confidence” that “Human-induced climate change, including more frequent and intense extreme events, has caused widespread adverse impacts and related losses and damages to nature and people, beyond climate variability”; “Widespread, pervasive impacts to ecosystems, people, settlements, and infrastructure have resulted from observed increases in the frequency and intensity of climate and weather extremes, including hot extremes on land and in the ocean, heavy precipitation events, drought and fire weather.” These impacts include severe threats to human health and security as well as growing geopolitical instability, particularly in non-resilient, highly vulnerable geographies around the world. A noted climate policy expert argues further that engaging "the social sciences are central for understanding how people and societies comprehend and respond to environmental changes." We wish to explore and support areas of investigation such as:

  • Research that aims to improve climate change and extreme, severe weather models and predictions, including the acquisition and integration of new data that helps better understand the coupled earth-ocean-atmosphere system.
  • Creative ideas to inform human and system adaptation strategies to the growing threat of climate change.
  • How to improve communication strategies around climate change and extreme weather. In particular, approaches to optimize the public’s understanding, preparedness and response to such extreme weather events.

Some representative example themes of interest include, but are not limited to topics such as:

  • How to mitigate the Impact of climate change on human health and health equity – from Oklahoma to the Global South.
  • What new geopolitical stresses arise that are driven at least in part by accelerating climate change, what opportunities arise for authoritarian regimes to gain and exert influence globally, and what are the threats that these instabilities pose to advanced democracies?
  • How to develop global partnerships that can help emerging economies in the developing world prepare for and adapt to the future impacts of climate change.
Aerospace, Defense, and Global Security
  • Geopolitical instability drivers and international security policy
  • Ethics, advanced technology, and the future of war and security
  • The global race for military technological supremacy in the 21st century and its impact on open academic research
  • Advancing AI, quantum technology, autonomy, hypersonics, software systems, advanced materials and manufacturing, and other advanced technologies for the future of defense and national security

     
Environment, Energy, and Sustainability
  • Social adaptation and design strategies to combat all aspects of climate change at the regional, national, and global level
  • Advanced technology developments to reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere—from advanced nuclear energy, to batteries and electrification, to CO2 capture, storage and use, etc.
  • Advanced methods and technologies for efficient and environmentally sound exploration, production, and utilization of fossil fuels
  • Developing resilient, sustainable communities through equitable policies and technological innovations
The Future of Health
  • Accelerating drug discovery to fight emerging diseases and pandemics
  • Policies and mechanisms for effective regional, national, and global health monitoring networks and response to emerging diseases
  • Combating social inequities in health care, including those arising from the spread of global pandemics today and in the future
  • Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, robotics and the future of health—the convergence of technology, engineering, data, science, privacy, and ethics to improve health outcomes


 

 

 

Society and Community Transformation
  • Big Data and other digital approaches and solutions to promote the humanities, arts, and social sciences
  • The human-machine interface and the design of cyber and physical infrastructure and technologies with human applications
  • The intersection of art, design, science, and technology
  • Advanced technologies, social media, and the future of democracy
  • Innovative approaches and solutions to eliminating inequities in the academic research and creative activity enterprise
  • The future of work—from universal income, to the design of future social and living structures, to the future of education and beyond
  • Rethinking early childhood to higher education models for the 21st century

 

It is understood that these topics often overlap and do not exist as isolated silos, and as such should only be interpreted as examples and a guide. For example, emerging diseases related to climate change, global security, and the future of health can greatly affect the dynamics of communities. As another example, MIT’s center for arts, science, and technology (CAST) brings together faculty from multiple disciplines and connects the worlds of art, science, and technology to thrive as interrelated, mutually informing modes of exploration, knowledge, and discovery. Additionally, exponential advances in digital technologies are, today more than ever, impacting the ways in which we live, learn, and work in ways that are not fully understood; the ethical, legal, and societal implications of this digital transformation are complex and in need of deep scholarly thought and innovative approaches and solutions. Other examples of successful projects along these lines can found at Purdue Discovery Park Big Idea Challenge

Faculty are encouraged to be broad in their approach and to create transdisciplinary teams that truly cut across these boundaries and tackle grand challenges holistically.  

The Application Process: Written proposals, oral presentations, and a proposed budget 

Written proposals shall not exceed three pages (single spaced, 12-point font, Times Roman) and will be evaluated to select projects for an oral presentation. The written proposal should include: 

  • A brief executive summary that articulates the global grand challenge the proposal aims to impact, the proposal’s Big Idea, and the potential impact of the idea.
  • A brief description of the unmet need that the Big Idea tackles.
  • What are the goals, expected outcomes, and impact on society of the project?
  • Why now?
  • A brief description of the team’s approach to meeting the goals, including an articulation of the path to sustained external funding and how the approach leverages OU resources.
  • A brief description of the benefits of the proposed solution to OU and the world.
  • Why OU? Include a description of the competition in the field and possible partnerships.
  • A set of milestones that will be met over the period of performance (not to exceed 24 months).

Other considerations include the following: 

  • The proposal must clearly identify a team leader and project champion who must be an experienced (tenured or tenure track) faculty member with a significant record of success in translating new ideas to extramural research support.
  • If possible, the proposal should identify a partner from a local or global community to strengthen the system approach and societal impact.
  • The milestones should set a clear path toward federal, private, or industrial funding after the BIC program ends. If selected for the BIC program, the team will work closely with OU’s Washington DC consultants (Lewis-Burke Associates) and with OU Advancement to find and create potential funding opportunities (federal, state, foundation, private, etc.) and develop a long-term vision for the research. The Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE) will be able to assist in the preparation of extramural proposals.
  • The milestones should set targets for tangible progress to be achieved and will be reviewed every six months for continuing funding.

Budgeting and Available Resources 

A detailed budget request aligned with the milestones should also be included but will not count toward the three-page limit. It is expected that a typical project will have a budget of up to $75,000 per year for up to two years. However, final budget determinations will be made after selection based on final scope and schedule. Budget resources will be provided by the OU Office of the Vice President for Research and Partnerships.

Cost share that reduces the overall cost to the VPRP office of a project (and therefore allows for more projects to be funded) from colleges or elsewhere is not required but is highly encouraged and valued.  

Continued budget allocation to a winning project will be contingent on satisfactory progress in meeting the bi-annual milestones. Projects that do not show sufficient progress against their milestones will be terminated prior to the two-year nominal performance term. No cost extensions beyond two years will be allowed.  

Proposals should be submitted to Ann West (awest@ou.edu) who is the Point of Contact for the BIC program in the OVPRP. West can facilitate pre- or post-award consultation of applicants with Lewis-Burke Associates or OU's Office of University Advancement and will coordinate with the Center for Faculty Excellence as appropriate.  

Timeline

2021 awards window is closed

Proposal Evaluation 

Proposals are evaluated by a team of selected OU academic leaders and external advisors representing the broad interests and capabilities of the campus. Care will be exercised to ensure intellectual diversity, in the evaluation team and that there is no conflict of interest in the proposal evaluation process. The proposals will be scored based on the following weighed criteria: 

  • 40% - Is the team truly interdisciplinary, integrating multiple academic disciplines into a transdisciplinary approach that is bigger than the sum of the parts? To what degree is this truly a new collaborative research endeavor? What will be the potential societal impact of the project?
  • 20% - How compelling is the Value Proposition? What intellectual value or contribution is represented by the idea? How strong is the scholarship/research base for the proposal? Will the project catalyze or enable new areas of research or new collaborations?
  • 40% - How likely is it that the big idea challenge funding will result in new federal, corporate, donor, and/or foundation funding at significant scale? Identify likely funding sources as specifically as possible. Why is this team, and why is OU, the right place to lead this effort? 

Teams whose written proposals are selected for oral presentation will be invited to pitch their Big Idea in an oral presentation to the evaluation committee. The teams will compete in a public process akin to an entrepreneur’s pitch to venture capitalists. Presentations will be strictly limited to 8 minutes, with an additional 7 minutes for questions, and are expected to address all elements of the project succinctly but clearly, as well as describe the project team leadership qualifications, milestones, and the budget. Details on presentation framework will be shared with the selected teams.