Public
Affairs Practitioner Survey Table 1
This survey is a convenience sample
filled out by 15 active duty military Public Affairs practitioners in an
attempt to determine how they felt they are being perceived by military
leaders. The survey used the following criteria for determining responses.
1 = strongly agree, 2 = somewhat agree, 3 = slightly agree, 4 = Unsure,
5 = slightly disagree, 6 = somewhat disagree, 7 = strongly disagree.
Mean
1) Public affairs practitioners
are seen as a valuable tool by the leadership.
2.86
2) Military leadership has a good
grasp on the roles and responsibilities of public affairs office.
3.93
3) The public affairs office is
used as a proactive management tool.
3.80
4) When planning for a large-scale
military activity, public affairs is included in the planning process from
the concept stage through implementation.
4.33
5) Public affairs is given the same
respect as a profession as other military career fields.
4.86
6) Public affairs practitioners
are trained in their craft priot to the placement into the PA job?
3.33
7) Public affairs is often assigned
as an additional duty.
4.13
8) Adequate training is available
and accessible to public affairs practitioners.
3.80
9) Leadership makes proper use of
the public affairs office.
3.60
10) Input from the public affairs
office is taken seriously by military leaders.
3.13
Allen, D.,
Beaufort, P., Choates, Y., Devine, C., (1999). Pilot Study.
Axelrod, G. (Producer), & Frankenheimer, J. (Director). (1962).
The Manchurian Candidate [Film]. Hollywood: MGM Studios, Inc.
Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research. 7th ed. Belmont,
California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Fink, S., (1986a). Crisis management. New York: Amacom.
Graber, D.A. (1980). Mass media and American politics.
University of Illinois: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Hays, S.P., & Glick, H.R. (1997). The role of agenda-setting in policy
innovation. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 497-516.
http://web.7.whs.osd.mil.text/d51225p.txt
Infante,
D. A., Rancer, A. S., Womack, D. F. (1997). Building communication
theory, (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL.: Waveland Press, Inc.
Likert,
R. (1932). A technique for measurement of attitudes. Archives of
Psychology, No. 140.
Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillian.
Littlejohn, R.F., (1983) Crisis management a team approach New York: American
Management Associations.
Littlejohn, S.W. (1996). Theories of human communication. Belmont:
Wadsworth Publishing Company.
McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media’s agenda setting
roles. Political Quarterly, 14, 433-444.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda setting function
of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
Miller, G., Boster, F., Roloff, M., Siebold, M. (1977). Compliance-gaining
message strategies; A typology and some findings concerning effects of
situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44. 65-83.
Rogers,
E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. London: Collier MacMillan Publishers.
Rogers,
E. (1986). Adoption and implementation of communication technologies.
Communication Technology: The Media in Society (pp. 116-149). NY: The Free
Press.
Rolbein,
S. (1995). Enemy within. Orleans: Association of the Preservation
of Cape Cod.
Rolbein,
S. (1998). About face. Orleans: Association of the Preservation
of Cape Cod.
Starr,
K. (1998). Referral from Independent Counsil Kenneth W. Starr in
conformity with the requirements of Title 28, United States Code, section
595(c): communication from Kenneth W. Starr, independent counsel, transmitting
a referral to the United States House of Representatives filed in conformity
with the requirements of Title 28, United States Code, section 595(c).
Library of Congress. http:lcweb.loc.gov/cgi-bin/browse.pl |
Homepage
Introduction
Literature Review
Method
Discussion
References
|