Week 12, Chapter 9 -- Adopt-a-SpeciesCourse home | Weekly schedule | Announcements | Instructor Info | Desire2Learn | MasteringBiology® | Honor Code | FAQs | HELP! |
In this assignment, you will develop fictional DNA fingerprinting and genetic engineering applications for the endangered species that you chose for your first Adopt-a-Species assignment. You MUST use the same species that you originally adopted!
Imagine that you are a consultant with two specialties: the conservation of endangered species, and genetic engineering. You have a particular interest in [your endangered species]. As it happens, you have been approached by two societies who saw your previous documentary on [your endangered species].
Here are some sites that might help you learn more about examples of DNA-based conservation research:
And here are some sites that might help you learn more about genetically modified organisms:
In addition, before you begin writing this assignment, consult the documentary you wrote for your first Adopt-a-Species assignment. You will also want to visit websites that give more information about your species. To complete this assignment, you may need to know these kinds of things about your species:
Write a report to each of the groups, using the following guidelines:
You can see sample reports here.
For full credit, your reports must meet the following criteria:
Post your documentary to your personal D2L Discussions forum, and click the "Save" button.
Because you're posting all your Adopt-a-Species assignments to the same forum, please include the words "Week 12" in the title of your post for this assignment. No matter what, always save a back-up copy of your assignment somewhere on your computer! Although you will save/post directly in D2L, you don't want to run the risk that it won't be there when you come back to access it.
Read the previous Adopt-a-Species assignments AND this week's assignments for two other students, as assigned in the D2L discussion board forum entitled "Adopt-a-Species: Response Grid" for this week. Add your comments to the posts of each student. Click on their name, then "add comment" to their specific post. If one or both of the students you are supposed to respond to have not posted an assignment by the deadline, you can respond to another student (or students) of your choice from our section of the class.
Make sure your response is substantive and constructive. This means that you have read and thought about the report and that, after some reflection, you are offering an additional perspective as you might in a good conversation. It is not enough to say simply "nice job", or "I liked that." The goal is to thoughtfully add something else interesting and new related to the content of the original post. At a minimum this should be at least 50 words, and 50-100 is preferable. Check out this page for more on the topic of good and bad responses.
After you have responded to two other students, complete the Gradebook Declaration for this week's Adopt-a-Species assignment in D2L Declarations. (Your Gradebook Declaration is subject to the Honor Code.) You will self-report your responses to other students' posts, but I will grade your entry myself, according to the rubric posted below.
Here is the text of the Desire2Learn Gradebook Declaration: (2 points) I have responded constructively to the posts of at least two other students (1 point per response; 50-100 words for each). |
Grading rubric for Week 12, Chapter 9 Adopt-a-Species assignment:
I will use the following rubric to grade your Adopt-a-Species assignments. Notice that the rubric does not heavily reward creativity; I am much more interested in looking for evidence that you fulfill the assignment criteria.
Standards |
|||
Criteria |
Full credit |
Half credit |
No credit |
Both reports use same species from previous Adopt-a-Species | Yes = 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
|
Report #1 explains how information from DNA could be useful in saving the species | Full explanation = 1 point |
Partial or incorrect explanation = 0.5 point |
No explanation = 0 points |
Report #1 suggests how you would select individuals to collect DNA from and how you would collect the DNA | Yes for both = 1 point |
Yes for one but not the other = 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
Report #1 describes how you would do the DNA fingerprinting | Yes = 1 point |
Yes, but with some inaccuracies = 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
Report #1 describes how you would use the results to answer your question | Yes = 1 point |
No = 0 points |
|
Report #2 suggests a genetic modification | Yes = 1 point |
No = 0 points |
|
Report #2 explains how the genetic modification might help the chosen species | Yes = 1 point |
No = 0 points |
|
Report #2 suggests a useful gene and a possible source for the gene | Yes for both = 2 points |
Yes for one but not the other = 1 point |
No for both = 0 points |
Report #2 describes or diagrams the steps for genetically engineering chosen species | Yes, without error = 1.5 point |
Yes, but with some inaccuracies = 0.5 to 1 point |
No = 0 points |
Report #2 explains a possible environmental impact of release | Yes, impact is plausible = 1 point |
Yes, but impact is not plausible or contains errors
= 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
Report #2 explains a possible environmental impact of gene transfer to another species | Yes, impact is plausible = 1 point |
Yes, but impact is not plausible or contains errors
= 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
All references cited correctly, including author, title, date, functioning hyperlink, and download date | Yes, without exception = 1 point |
Yes, but not always = 0.5 point |
No = 0 points |
Please note that points will be deducted as follows if you fail to meet the "mechanical" requirements of the assignment: