|
||||
|
First record
of Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in southern
localities of Uruguay.
Goñi, B., P. Fresia, M. Calviño, M.J.
Ferreiro, V.L.S. Valente* and L. Basso da Silva*. Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto
de Biología, Sección Genética Evolutiva, Universidad
de la República, Igua 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay. E-mail: bgoni@fcien.edu.uy.
*Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Caixa Postal 15053, 91501-970 Porto Alegre,
RS, Brasil.
As part of a collaborative research project, we have
been performing regular field collection of drosophilids in several localities
from Uruguay with the aim to contribute to the knowledge of Neotropical fauna.
Part of the data recorded up to now on Drosophila fauna of this region was published elsewhere (Goñi
and Martinez, 1995; Goñi
et al., 1997, 1998). Here, we present three years collection
data of drosophilids recorded in several southern localities of Uruguay with
reference to the first register of occurrence of Zaprionus indianus Gupta 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae), and to some ecological
considerations.
The genus Zaprionus, Coquillet, 1901 is composed by two subgenus with 57
species (Chassagnard and Kraaijeveld, 1991; Chassagnard and Tsacas, 1993, reviewed by Vilela et al., 2001).
They inhabit mainly in the Australasian, Afrotropical, Oriental and
Palearctic biogeographical regions.
The origin of this species is supposedly found in the Afrotropical
region, and it has recently been introduced in the American continent. It was first registered in Brazil in March, 1999, in a sample
of flies collected over persimmon fruits (Diospyrus kaky L., Ebenaceae) in Santa Isabel county, the State of São
Paulo, Brazil (Vilela, 1999). In
December of the same year, Z. indianus was found in the State of Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil
(De Toni et al., 2001).
Later, in March 2000, it was collected in the city of Porto Alegre,
in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, the southernmost state of Brazil (see Castro
and Valente, this issue). This species was also recorded in several
Brazilian states adjacent to the São Paulo State (Stein and Teixeira, 2000). Z. indianus was found to be
associated to several kinds of fruits belonging to both native and exotic
species to the American continent (De Toni et al., 2001; Vilela
et al. 2001; Castro and Valente, this issue). It was also attracted to banana baits
(De Toni et al., 2001).
Z. indianus is a generalist drosophilid species (Chassagnard and
Kraaijeveld, 1991) and the only member of the genus which seems to be dispersing
through the tropics, probably due to an intensification in fruits trade in
the world (Vilela, 1999). This
species gained the status as pest, since it caused a loss on the production
and exportation of figs (Ficus carica var. roxo-de-valinhos) of the 1999 harvest (around 40%
and 80% losses, respectively) in the area of Valinhos the State of São
Paulo and thus striking local economy (Stein and Teixeira, 2000, Vilela et al. 2001). The commercialisation
and transport of the infected fig production to different Brazilian states,
mainly by the supermarket trade network, could have facilitated the fast dispersal
of this fly.
Adults flies of this species are easily distinguishable
from Neotropical drosophilids, since they show a pair of distinctive silvery-white
stripes along the submedian area of the dorsal surface of the head and the
thorax flanked by thin black stripes, a trait not found in the Neotropical
species of drosophilids (Vilela, 1999).
Table 1. Localities,
main biogeographical features, data of collection and resources used
at each locality.
1For further details see Goñi et al (1998). 2F*=
Adult flies collected on banana-baited trap over the resources(s)
indicated. 3Adult
flies collected on fruits of both resources simultaneously, as indicated.
4Collection on May 14th & 15th
(a) and 29th (b). N = native, E = exotic.
|
We have collected drosophilids in three different regions
from Uruguay (Table 1) dating from April 1999 to May 2001. Depending on the substrates availability,
adult flies were caught on rotting fruits and/or banana baits to obtain data
on adult feeding sites (Table 1). Moreover, fruits of both exotic and native plants were collected
to obtain data on larval breeding sites (Table 1). A detailed description of the methodological
procedures is found in Goñi et al. (1998).
Table 2. Resources used as feeding and/ or breeding
sites by Zaprionus indianus in the sampled localities.
|
We
collected 24,837 flies during the whole period of study (Goñi et
al., unpublished data). It included species
members of the Drosophila and
the Zaprionus genera, the species
Zaprionus indianus being the
only representive of the latter genus. Table 2 indicates
the number and the relative frequency of Z. indianus in relation to a given sample and the related substrate
used as feeding and/or breeding site. Z. indianus was found for
the first time in Uruguay in April 2000, emerging from
fruits of Butia yatai (native
species, see Table 2) collected in the Facultad de Agronomia, Montevideo. In the same place, Z. indianus emerged from sampled fruits of Gingko biloba (exotic) in May 2001. Moreover, we collected this species on fruits of Psidium
guayava (native) in May 2000 at
Santa Lucía, and on Butia capitata
(native) and on banana baited trap, in the localities I and III, respectively,
at the Rocha's wetlands, May 2000. In
all cases, Z. indianus was found
in very low frequency, ranging from 0.05% to 3.28%.
It is worth mentioning that Z. indianus was absent in the samples collected at the native forest
(locality II of Rocha's wetlands at about 10 km and 3 km apart from the localities
I and III, respectively, see Table 1). Our data indicate that Z. indianus was collected at partially man-disturbed environments
referred to as urban or suburban in Table 1, which could ease the colonization
of non-native drosophilids. In
Brazil, it seems that Z. indianus has successfully colonized urban areas of Porto Alegre
city (Castro and Valente, this issue) being recorded in almost all samples
in autumn and summer. On the
other hand, we have showed that Z. indianus
is able to breed on native fruits and, therefore, able to invade natural environments
and to compete for natural resources with, among others, native or cosmopolitan
species of Drosophila.
While Z. indianus reaches relative frequencies as high as 45% in Southern Brazil (De Toni et al., 2001; Castro
and Valente, this issue), it is found in very low frequency at the surveyed
Uruguayan localities. Further
studies should be performed to monitor the course of Z. indianus
colonization and its relation to biotic (for instance, breeding sites) and
abiotic factors (like temperature) in this temperate region of South America. Without doubt, Z. indianus constitutes an invaluable material to investigate the
genetic strategy of a colonizer species.
Acknowledgments:
This work was partly supported by the grants from the Comisión
Sectorial de Investigación Científica (CSIC) de la Universidad
de la República to BG and LBS.
References: Castro, F., and V.L.S. Valente 2001, Dros. Inf. Serv. (this issue); Chassagnard, M.Th., and A.R. Kraaijeveld 1991, Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 27(4): 495-496; Chassagnard, M.Th., and L. Tsacas 1993, Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 29(2): 173-174; De Toni, D., P.R.P. Hofmann, and V.L.S. Valente 2001, Biotemas 14(1): 71-85; Goñi, B., and M.E. Martinez 1995, Dros. Inf. Serv. 76: 164; Goñi, B., M.E. Martinez, and P. Daguere 1997, Revta. bras. Ent. 41(1): 89-93; Goñi, B., M.E. Martinez, V.L.S. Valente, and C.R. Vilela 1998, Revta. bras. Ent. 42: 131-140; Stein, C.P., and E.P. Teixeira 2000, XXI Int. Congr. Ent., vol. I, p. 297; Vilela, C.R., 1999, Dros. Inf. Serv. 82: 37-39; Vilela, C.R., E.P. Teixeira, and C.P. Stein 2001, in: Histórico e impacto das pragas introduzidas no Brasil (Vilela, E.F., R.A. Zucci, and F. Canton, ed.) Chapter 7, pp. 48-52, Holos, São Paulo, Brazil.